Nottingham Forest in Henderson talks

A further update on the status of Nottingham Forest target Dean Henderson has been issued.

What’s the word?

As per Fabrizio Romano, the deal is fast developing, with the Italian taking to his personal Twitter page to reveal further details.

Romano said: “Dean Henderson deal update. Talks in progress also today between Man United and Nottingham Forest, no agreement yet on buy option clause value so it could be removed. Deal could be completed on simple loan. Work in progress.”

Cooper surely elated

Having made no appearances in the Premier League this season for Manchester United, it is time for 25-year-old Henderson to find pastures new.

Under the tutelage of Steve Cooper, Henderson could well rejuvenate his career and take influence from James Garner, who has enjoyed an emphatic couple of seasons at the City Ground.

Whilst there is a slight twist in the buy-out fee, a simple loan, as Romano puts it, may be the Englishman’s best option.

That is, of course, when you consider the competition for the number one spot at Forest, given Samba’s emphatic efforts between the sticks throughout their Championship promotion campaign.

Rather appallingly, Henderson made just 1-1 draw against BSC Young Boys, and even then – having acquired a save percentage of 75% – was only given 68 minutes on the pitch before third choice Tom Heaton replaced him.

Forest may well be in for a real scrap in their bid to renew their Premier League status this season, and a goalkeeper who understands what it takes to avoid relegation, as well as one that will be hungry to prove a point, may well help to get the Tricky Trees over the line.

This is a fantastic deal and Romano’s latest update points in all the right directions for Cooper and co who will no doubt love to sign the stopper.

In other news: Nottingham Forest eye move for “big” 92-goal “predator”, just imagine him & Johnson 

Newcastle eye Arsenal striker Eddie Nketiah

Newcastle United are reportedly now eyeing up a move for Eddie Nketiah this summer.

The Lowdown: Out of contract

The 22-year-old is out of contract in the summer and Arsenal have reportedly now made their final offer in order to try and convince him to remain at the Emirates Stadium.

Dubbed a player with an ‘incredible work-rate’, ‘pace’ and a ‘smell for goals’ by Gunners boss Mikel Arteta (Sportskeeda), the striker scored five goals in his last seven games in the Premier League, helping his team to secure five wins in the process (Transfermarkt).

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/newcastle-news-6/” title=”Newcastle news!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The Latest: Newcastle lurking for Nketiah

Taking to Twitter, Luke Edwards has revealed that Newcastle are now watching Nketiah’s situation ‘closely’, along with Crystal Palace.

Addressing the Arsenal man’s future, The Telegraph journalist outlined: “#nufc are also watching this situation closely and the player is good friends with Joe Willock.”

The Verdict: No-brainer

It is a no-brainer for Newcastle to sign Nketiah on a free transfer, especially given the fact that he is English (therefore contributing towards homegrown quota), in a rich vein of form and only 22 years of age.

He could be a great squad option to supplement both Callum Wilson and Chris Wood in attack, and if it did not work out at St James’ Park for whatever reason, the Magpies could still sell him on for a profit.

Nonetheless, with his friend and former Arsenal team-mate Willock on Tyneside, Nketiah should be able to settle in fairly comfortably should he end up making the move to the northeast.

In other news, find out what NUFC deal is reportedly now ‘close’

Leeds: Hay drops Garner transfer claim

Phil Hay has dropped an update on reported Leeds United transfer target James Garner.

What’s the talk?

In recent comments made on The Phil Hay Show, the titular journalist revealed that he has been told the Nottingham Forest loanee is a player on Victor Orta’s list of summer transfer targets.

Previous reports have suggested that Manchester United – the defensive midfielder’s parent club – could be willing to sanction the 21-year-old’s departure in the coming months, as Erik ten Hag is targeting the signing of a player in the England U21 international’s position this summer – with Leeds’ Kalvin Phillips thought to be a £60m option for the Dutchman.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-leeds-united-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-much-more-2″ title=”Read the latest Leeds news, transfer rumours and more!”]

Regarding the Whites’ interest in the youngster, Hay said: “James Garner, who’s been at Forest on loan from Man United, is somebody who’s been mentioned to me a couple of times as somebody they’d like.”

Supporters will love Hay’s claim

Considering just how exciting a prospect Garner quite clearly is, in addition to the fact that Phillips has been heavily linked with a big-money move away from Elland Road this summer, it is easy to see why Orta would be interested in a move for the 21-year-old ahead of the club’s 2022/23 campaign.

Indeed, over his 41 Championship appearances this season, the £6.3m-rated talent has been in exceptional form for Steve Cooper’s side, scoring four goals, registering eight assists and creating seven big chances for his teammates, as well as taking an average of 1.1 shots and making 2.0 key passes per game.

The £20k-per-week midfielder has also impressed in metrics more typical of his position, making an average of 1.4 interceptions, 1.8 tackles, 0.9 clearances and winning 3.9 duels – at a success rate of 53% – per fixture.

These returns have seen the player who Trevor Sinclair compared to David Beckham average a quite astonishing SofaScore match rating of 7.26, not only ranking him as the Reds’ best performer in the second tier but also as the joint third-best player in the division as a whole.

As such, it is abundantly clear to see just how impressive a signing the 21-year-old would be for Orta to secure for Leeds this summer, leading us to believe that Hay’s claim concerning the Whites’ interest in the midfielder will be an update that the Elland Road faithful will love.

AND in other news: Phil Hay drops exciting Leeds United transfer update that’ll leave supporters buzzing

Manchester United: Big Cristiano Ronaldo transfer claim

Manchester United forward Cristiano Ronaldo may remain at the centre of a transfer saga, even though the market has closed until January. 

That’s according to transfer insider Dean Jones, who was speaking to GiveMeSport.

The lowdown

The 37-year-old tried to secure a move away from United this summer because he wanted to play in the Champions League rather than the Europa League. However, Erik ten Hag was adamant that the Portuguese veteran would remain at the club, and the Red Devils held firm in their stance.

The contract that Ronaldo signed on his return to Old Trafford a year ago expires at the end of the season, but United have the option to extend it by a further year.

The latest

While some United fans may have been breathing a sigh of relief that the ‘Ronaldo situation’ will no longer be a headline with the transfer window now closed, Jones has issued a warning that it might not go away just yet.

He told GiveMeSport: “We’ll have to wait and see on the Ronaldo situation. Although he has stayed, I can see that the story could somehow still continue beyond the transfer window.”

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-man-utd-updates-5/” title=”Latest Man Utd updates!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The verdict

This is a worrying claim for United supporters.

Ten Hag is starting to build some momentum on the pitch, having overseen four consecutive Premier League victories in response to a disastrous start to the campaign.

However, if Ronaldo – the highest earner at the club on £515,000 per week and their highest-profile player by social media followers – agitates to leave, it could create an unhelpful distraction. Indeed, there have already been reports that some United players and staff are losing patience with the ‘moody’ forward.

There’s a possibility that Ten Hag’s management of Ronaldo might only exacerbate the issue. The 37-year-old has been named amongst the substitutes for the past four Premier League matches, and if this trend continues, he may become even more unhappy at Old Trafford.

Maxwell the MVP while Sams and Rashid top Smart Wickets

At the halfway stage of BBL 2019-20, ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats reveal the best performers so far

Gaurav Sundararaman09-Jan-2020At the halfway stage of BBL 2019-20, Melbourne Stars are dominating the league having won six of their seven games. Glenn Maxwell has led from the front with strong support from Marcus Stoinis. So far, Maxwell is the Most Valuable Player in BBL 19.ESPNcricinfo LtdAccording to ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats, which takes into account not just the runs scored and wickets taken but also the match context and quality of those runs and wickets, Maxwell notched up a total impact score of 527, which was well clear of second-placed Callum Ferguson, whose score is 398. Maxwell’s impact with the bat has been crucial in taking the Stars to the top of the table. He has come in to bat in some crucial stages after the loss of multiple wickets while batting first or while chasing a target. He has seen through the chase on two occasions, and once scored 83 from 39 balls coming in at 59 for 3. Although Maxwell has bowled only 13 overs, he has taken crucial wickets in the Powerplay by removing the best batsmen in the opposition team. Maxwell got Alex Hales and Usman Khawaja against Sydney Thunder while removing D’Arcy Short and David Miller against Hobart Hurricanes.Ferguson and Stoinis have been exchanging the Golden Cap match after match and they have had a significant impact on their respective teams. Tom Curran is the only overseas recruit among the top five, having helped Sydney Sixers win matches with the bat and ball, coming in tough situations where the required run rate was way beyond reach. From smashing 24 runs off Matt Kelly against Perth Scorchers and winning the Super over with bat and ball against the Thunder, Curran’s impact has been huge.The Batting impact score is derived taking into account Smart Runs (factors taken are the innings run rate, required run rate at every ball when the batsman scored his runs, the quality of opposition bowlers, wickets in hand, the quality of batsmen to follow and the match situation) and the replacement benefit or cost to the team, as the case may be, if the batsmen’s performance is replaced with the match average.The Bowling impact score is derived taking into account Smart Economy and Smart Wickets (factors taken are the phase in which the bowler bowled, the current/required rate, the quality of batsmen dismissed and the match context when wickets were taken) and the replacement benefit or cost to the team, as the case may be, if the bowler’s performance is replaced with the match average.Total Impact Score is a sum of the Batting and Bowling Impact scores in each match.ESPNcricinfo Ltd Smart WicketsWhile the batsmen have been impactful at various times, some bowlers have stood out with match winning performances and key wickets at crucial stages too. Daniel Sams , Haris Rauf and Tom Curran lead the wicket taking chart in the competition, but ESPNCricinfo’s Smart Stats paints a slightly different picture. In terms of Smart Wickets, Sams leads the pack with 15 Smart Wickets while Rashid Khan and Riley Meredith are joint-second with 14 Smart Wickets. Adam Zampa and Tom Curran complete the top five with 11 Smart Wickets. The reason Rashid Khan’s 12 wickets are worth 14 is because Smart Wickets takes into the account the following:- The quality of the batsman dismissed, which means dismissing a top order batsmen fetches more points than dismissing a tailender
– The score at which a batsman was dismissed, which means dismissing a batsman for a single-digit score is more rewarding than getting him out for 60.
– The match situation at the time of the dismissal, which means dismissing a batsman when the match is in the balance is worth more than getting him out when the result of the game is all but decided.
Rashid’s been a partnership breaker and taken out the most top order batsmen across teams. When Liam Livingstone and Josh Inglis added 124 runs in 8.3 overs, Rashid dismissed both in two balls to help Adelaide Strikers come back and win the match by 15 runs. Rashid also took a hat-trick when his team was defending a very low score. Pakistan and the Stars Sensation Rauf has a five-wicket haul and a hat-trick, and has taken 13 wickets so far. He is the joint second highest wicket taker in the BBL. However, it is worth noting that his 13 wickets are worth only 10. Three of his wickets in his five-wicket haul came against the Hurricanes after the match was almost won, and were of lower-order batsmen. Only eight of his 13 wickets have been in key situations, where the match was in balance. Those eight were wickets of batsmen, while the other five were wickets of the lower order players.ESPNcricinfo Ltd Smart Strike Rate At the halfway stage of the BBL, certain batsmen have not only scored impact runs but have also scored them at a brisk pace. ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Strike rate evaluates this aspect of the game. In terms of Smart Strike Rate, which is calculated by dividing Smart Runs by balls faced, England’s opening prodigy Tom Banton stands tall at 237.96 , well clear of his team mate Chis Lynn, who is on 193.6. Interestingly, Tom Curran makes the list having scored vital runs to close the game. Livingstone and Maxwell complete the top five.Smart Stats is a part of Superstats, a new set of metrics by ESPNcricinfo to tell more enriching and insightful numbers-based stories. To know more about Superstats, click here.

Full deliveries a reminder of what makes Broad effective

But there was still the feeling he bowled a little too short, especially with the first new ball when Trent Boult and Tim Southee had pitched theirs up with devastating effect

Andrew McGlashan in Christchurch31-Mar-2018A lot can change in a week. Just ask David Warner, Steven Smith, Cameron Bancroft and Darren Lehmann. In a less dramatic way, things have changed for Stuart Broad. Or actually, in a sense, they haven’t.In the build-up to the Auckland Test there was a strong indication that he would lose the new ball role he has held, largely without interruption, since 2013. Then England were bowled out for 58 and there was no time to try something new. Broad took the new ball alongside James Anderson.

‘Felt in the best rhythm I have for a couple of years’

Stuart Broad said his second-day performance in Christchurch was as well as he had bowled since his 6 for 17 against South Africa in Johannesburg more than two years ago. Broad took 4 for 38, moving ahead of Curtly Ambrose in the all-time list, to give England the advantage having spent a lot of time working on his action before this series.
“I’ve a had a couple of four-fors since then, but don’t think I’ve created as many plays and misses and chances. Today, I hit length hard, I was snapping into it. That gives me a lot of confidence and it proves, at the most basic form, that a bit of a hard work really pays off.
“I felt in the best rhythm I have for a couple of years. I was rubbish in Australia, to be honest. It was the lack of bounce I was getting because of my wrist. Everything about my bowling today, I felt in full control. The ball was bouncing through, it had pace, it was nipping. It’s quite an exciting place to be. When you see improvements over a short period of time it gives you a lot of energy.”

His 400th Test wicket, when Tom Latham clipped to midwicket, was one of the more subdued landmark moments you could see but there were small signs that the work he had put in during the alone hours in the Trent Bridge indoor school were paying off. There was a little bit more zip and bounce than in Australia and he was better aligned to the right-handers.But there was still the feeling he bowled a little too short, especially with the first new ball when Trent Boult and Tim Southee had pitched theirs up with devastating effect. The length of England’s new-ball bowlers has often been a gripe and was never more evident than the first afternoon of the Adelaide Ashes Test when Joe Root had put Australia in and watched his senior duo waste conditions.Two days before the second Test in Christchurch, Root had a long meeting with his bowlers which ran well past the end of an already lengthy training session. There have been a lot of meetings in the last few days. What was said will probably remain behind closed doors, but it would be a surprise if pitching the ball up had not been on the agenda.If it wasn’t, and the second morning in Christchurch was just Anderson and Broad thinking on their feet, then you would have to wonder why they couldn’t have done it before.The effect of pushing the ball full was almost instant and for Broad made for his most impressive spell since the start of the Ashes. He drew Latham onto the front foot, finding the outside edge as the opener looked to drive, then pushed one out a touch wider to Ross Taylor who couldn’t resist a flat-footed flash which sent a catch to Alastair Cook at first slip. The scalp of Taylor will have been especially satisfying as it continued a hold Broad has had over him throughout their contests together. This was the 10th time he had dismissed Taylor in 14 Tests.A full length also soon defeated Henry Nicholls, the ball nipping past the inside edge to take the back pad. CricViz analysis during Broad’s first spell showed at one point he was pitching 37% of his deliveries in a full-length area compared to 30% normally – the difference in length was calculated at 30cm.Bowlers have a natural length and it can be difficult to adjust at the drop of a hat, but when Broad gains the success he did pitching it up. it is a wonder why it hasn’t been his default. When Broad went through a previous struggle in 2011 it came during a time when he was given the ‘enforcer’ tag which led him to bowling too short. After a lean series against Sri Lanka that summer, he then pitched the ball up against India and took 25 wickets in four Tests at 13.84.”To go away and play for Notts and get a five-for pitching the ball up a week before the Test gave me a lot of confidence,” he said at the time. “That was how I wanted to bowl in this series but then for it to happen straight away at Lord’s, to pick up four wickets and could have potentially had more, that length showed me the way to go.”This time, the problems, Broad believed, had been caused by bowling so much round the wicket to the left handers. Leading into this series, having worked hard to make small corrections, Broad spoke about having plenty of legs in him at Test level. “I’m in a place now where I feel like I can do quite a bit of damage as a bowler again,” he said. Whether the new-ball talk was a ploy to get the competitive juices flowing or not, it may now be a little while before the Anderson-Broad partnership is broken.The new-ball burst didn’t last long enough to be classed as a return to the streaks that made him such a devastating bowler up until early 2016, but there were signs that he still has some more in him. However, late in the day, with England having endured a 142-run partnership between BJ Watling and Colin de Grandhomme, Broad returned and struck with his second ball. How? Yes, it was a full delivery that got the batsman driving. Saturday’s performance wasn’t a case of teaching an old(ish, by fast bowling standards) dog new tricks, but reminding him of the ones that make him most effective.

Zimbabwe's ODI implosion, and India's fast-bowling expansion

India’s emerging fast-bowling depth and Zimbabwe’s lack of fight in the 50-over format were among the most striking features of the short, sharp tour

Alagappan Muthu and Karthik Krishnaswamy24-Jun-2016Lack of 50-over fight a worry for Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe won the first T20I and came within one hit of winning the third T20I. But they didn’t come anywhere near winning anything in the ODI series, and were bowled out for 168, 126 and 123 in the three matches. It showed that it takes a far wider range of qualities, technical and mental, to compete over 100 overs and that Zimbabwe, in this series at least, lacked those qualities. It was a little perplexing to watch, because this was more or less the same set of players that had given India a scare during the ODI series last year.Most of the issues stemmed from what seemed like a soft-centred batting line-up. A series of poor decisions from the batsmen led to a reasonably promising 106 for 3 turning into 126 all out in the second ODI, and a similar collapse in the third ODI saw Zimbabwe lose their last seven wickets for 19 runs.Zimbabwe’s batting leaders need to step up
Elton Chigumbura has played 202 ODIs, Hamilton Masakadza 168, Vusi Sibanda 127, Chamu Chibhabha 96, Sikandar Raza and Malcolm Waller 57 each. Throw in Sean Williams (96) and Craig Ervine (48), who missed a bulk of the series with injuries, and Zimbabwe have an experienced batting line-up. But through the ODI series, they failed to make use of that experience, and kept throwing their wickets away. Masakadza fell to a couple of soft dismissals, Sibanda and Raza played daft shots after putting on a promising partnership in the second ODI, and Chigumbura seemed to be batting at least one slot too low. For Zimbabwe to turn their ODI fortunes around, they will have to start by batting through 50 overs consistently, and that will need their best batsmen to re-learn the art of building innings.Ntini has raw material to work with
It is not known how long Makhaya Ntini’s stint as head coach will last, but he is likely to remain in charge of Zimbabwe’s bowlers for a fairly long time. He has a decent group of fast bowlers to work with: Donald Tiripano and Neville Madziva showed promise in the T20I series, Tendai Chatara seems to be gradually returning to his pre-injury best, while Tinashe Panyangara should return in due course from his back injury. The spin group doesn’t look bad either: Graeme Cremer is now a firmly established, international-class legspinner, Wellington Masakadza showed a lot of promise during the World T20, and Tendai Chisoro has shown his left-arm spin can hold up to the pressure of bowling with the new ball. Lots of promise, then, but Zimbabwe will need two or three of these names to go one step beyond promise and become fully-rounded operators at the top level. Can Ntini help them take that step?India’s fast-bowling depth
Jasprit Bumrah’s stock delivery comes into the right-hander. But in Harare, he was able to straighten the ball too. His style of bowling – hitting the deck – minimises swing through the air, so being able to move it both ways off the pitch is an impressive development.Barinder Sran’s success in Harare was old-fashioned. He pitched the ball up and made it swing. A left-arm fast bowler almost always threatens the outside edge of a right-hander from over the wicket. Sran’s inswinger added to that threat, although some of his wickets may have been the result of bowler-friendly conditions.Dhawal Kulkarni had a fine IPL – 14 of his 18 wickets came in the Powerplay, and he reprised that threat in Zimbabwe. The wicket-to-wicket lines and back-of-a-length preference makes him hard to hit when there is help on offer.All of that meant India’s limited-overs captain MS Dhoni was quite happy. “We can proudly say we have 10-12 bowlers who can play for the country,” he said.Takeaways, with a pinch of salt
Nine Indians were introduced to international cricket on this tour. KL Rahul became the first of his countrymen to hit a century on ODI debut; he got to the milestone with a six over long-on. His free-flowing strokeplay bolstered his argument that he wasn’t just a Test match specialist. But how much weight should be put on performances against a Zimbabwe side that kept self-destructing?Ordinarily, an emerging player with 196 runs in three ODIs would think he has a strong chance to continue playing for his country. And Rahul has already been pushing Shikhar Dhawan hard in Test cricket, but has his work of chasing down tiny totals and playing with very little pressure exerted by the opposition good enough to put him into a full-strength Indian XI?Faiz Fazal was handed an ODI debut at the age of 30 and he made a half-century to mark the occasion but it is difficult to see him getting further chances. Kedar Jadhav hit his maiden ODI hundred on the last Zimbabwe tour, had to wait for this one to resume his 50-over career and is still waiting to face his first ball in the format since July 2015.India went to Zimbabwe looking, among other things, to find batsmen who could take charge in the slog overs. They lost one match – the first T20 – where the middle order needed to step up and returned home with Nos. 4 through 11 facing only one ball in the entire ODI series.

'Umpires are not soft targets, they're participants in the game'

Simon Taufel says the Indian umpires he works with have been making a lot of progress, but they are yet to earn the respect they deserve from players and the public

Nagraj Gollapudi and Gaurav Kalra29-May-20159:56

‘We want to be treated equally with the players’

“Pehle aap,” “Aap ke baad,” .Why have we not seen an umpire like Simon Taufel in India?
I cannot answer why we do not have anyone at the international level. There has been a lot of debate about that, but for me to explain the work we are doing in India I need to establish where we come from. Two years ago when I stopped umpiring, we looked at developing a structure of advancing umpiring globally. We have four umpiring coaches who work with the ICC. I look after India and have looked to establish a relationship with the country. We develop coaching plans and strategies and a consistent pathway of what is needed to succeed at the highest level and appreciate that the game is changing all the time. The latest technology and umpiring in different conditions is a part of it – like umpiring in hot conditions in Kolkata.Do you see a lack of belief in their own ability among Indian umpires?
What has struck me about Indian umpires is their passion, enthusiasm, desire and hunger, their thirst for knowledge and their love of the game. We have tried to harness that and support them with better resources. We are encouraging them and guiding them about where they can improve and develop.I feel the IPL is a tremendous opportunity for the Indian umpires to work with the best in the world and learn from them. There’s great media scrutiny, huge crowds, and the top players are involved. We can see how they respond, and reinforce what they are doing well. They are doing well largely and it is about giving them self-belief. There have been a lot of success stories over the last few years. We have had Indian umpires officiating at the World Cup and we have two umpires going to the World T20 qualifiers. We had three Indian match referees this IPL. We can provide the right environment, the rest depends on them.Is the balance involved in officiating in a high-pressure game easy to achieve?
No, it’s not. That is the challenge. In this part of the world, umpiring is always seen from a decision-making perspective, whereas in some other countries it is all about people skills. It is about how you handle pressure and respond to the players, the respect, trust and other soft skills. We are trying to redress the balance between the tremendous knowledge of laws that is present here and combine that with the soft skills. The only way you can do that is by engaging them and talking to people. That is why it has been great working with them in the background at the IPL. We can engage with them in post-match debriefs and the hotel rooms. We can talk about how to handle an error or a setback, how to deal with a player who is in your face, and how to deal with iconic players while being a good officiator.

“What is really encouraging and pleasing to see is how Indian umpires are fitting into umpiring systems around the world. They speak the same umpiring language. They speak the cricketing language”

You speak quite a few words in Hindi and can even string together short sentences. It must come handy in your job.
The key is understanding [each other]. We can talk about different languages and cultures, but unless you understand me as a person and I understand you as a person, unless we know what things mean, we do not have effective communication. Unless we have understanding and acknowledgement and respect, we do not have effective communication. It might sound basic and fundamental, but if this is my designated country for me to work with, I need to understand India. I need to understand the culture, the biases. I need to understand some of the words, some of the meanings, because that will help me understand where these people are coming from. Human behaviour is a funny thing – if I stick out my hand, chances are that you are going to reciprocate. If I raise my voice, chances are you might raise your voice and get upset. So if I am looking for understanding and a particular behaviour from the people I work with, I need to try and demonstrate that initially.Have the Indian umpires reciprocated?
They have responded tremendously genuinely. There is an element of Indian culture where sometimes people tell you what you want to hear. But what I am looking at is the genuine effort and understanding to do things for the right reasons. Not because I want it, not because the ICC wants it, but because it is the right thing to do. When we talk about consistency, when we talk about best practices, when we talk about effective teamwork, one of our strategies – not just in India but with all the top domestic umpires – is to reach an understanding about how we are going to work with each other. That could be from what words mean, what signals we give to each other on the field, how we prepare for a game, how we appreciate individual differences, what is expected when you do a match report, what is expected when you go in for a code-of-conduct of hearing, what is expected when you look at a suspect bowling action, how you carry yourself when you walk out of a hotel, how you arrive at a game, how you stick together as a team at events.Now, we have umpire exchange programmes between the boards. So Shamshuddin went to Australia this season. Nandan is about to go to England to do an exchange. Chaudhary went to Australia last season. What is really encouraging and pleasing is to see is how the Indian umpires are fitting into umpiring systems around the world. They speak the same umpiring language.”We had Indian umpire S Ravi at the World Cup. Firstly, he got selected, and secondly, he performed well. He held his own”•IDI/Getty ImagesDo you think domestic umpires in India are not getting enough respect from the players?
Yes, I do. We expect of our umpires that they have tremendous empathy for what the players go through. They put in lot of hours of training. They want to be successful. There is a lot of money involved in their contracts. And there is a lot of fame and fortune that they can attain if they are successful. We would love the players to appreciate and show equal empathy for the difficult nature of our job, appreciate that better umpires get it right, that we are human beings after all. We do it because we love it and because we want to add value. I am yet to come across an umpire who wants to give a bad decision or have a negative impact on the game. There is a lot of pride amongst our group.Would you like to see more players venture into umpiring? Is playing experience an advantage?
What I would like to see more in India is players respecting how difficult umpiring is; maybe try it themselves. It would be great to see a Rahul Dravid or a Sachin Tendulkar donning a white coat.What specific feedback have Indian umpires given you about the players?
Umpires come from a background of being forgotten about. In many countries umpires are the last group to be thought of, whether it is change rooms, provisions, support structures, catering, uniforms. The work we are trying to do in India is no different from some of the other parts of the world. We don’t want to be treated better than the players. We want to be treated equally because we have an equal contribution to make to the game. When the umpires do well, they won’t get noticed. When the umpires do something wrong, they stick out.So here in India I’d love the players and the captains to realise they need to be part of the solution to improve Indian umpiring and not part of the problem. At the end of the day, you can tell a winning captain’s report from a losing captain’s report – umpires either have given too many lbws or they have not given enough. If they [players] are going to give us feedback, give us constructive feedback. Don’t tell us they missed three caught-behinds and three lbws. Tell us he seemed to lose concentration and focus in the last session on day one. That he was not in a good frame of mind to communicate effectively. That he was in a bad position to make that run-out decision.You have been interacting closely with Indian umpires from 2006. In which areas have they shown growth?
One of the areas they have changed is in their honesty. The first part of really developing as a human being or a cricket umpire is being honest with yourself about what you are doing well and what you could do better. There is a culture here in India where sometimes you get things because of who you know or because there is a way around the system. Now the umpires themselves have embraced honesty. They have embraced the value of integrity and being true to what they have got to do. And to make tough decisions because they are the right decisions to be made – whether it is a suspect bowling action, whether it is out or not out, whether it is starting a game or finishing a game.The BCCI has made tremendous progress in providing an environment that supports that shift. They are also promoting meritocracy – that umpires will go forward based on their performance, not from where they came from or who they know. Last year, a panel of match referees was formed and we worked with 120 candidates and chose 50. They have contributed to a stronger domestic circuit this year.

“The goal is not to put an Indian umpire on the Elite Panel; that is a nice by-product. The goal here is to improve umpiring in this country, position ourselves, and deliver the best umpiring to people who play”

How do you evaluate progress?
It is easy for me to evaluate as I come back every year and I see things from a fresh perspective. Indian umpires are now being chosen for world events and the playoffs of the IPL. When I joined the IPL in the second season [2009], there were no Indian umpires in the playoffs. Here we are six years later, we have got the highest number of Indian umpires involved in the playoffs. The other night we had two Indian umpires on field in the Eliminator.That tells me, tells the rest of the world and tells the Indian umpires that people who are selecting them for those matches had faith and trust in the performance abilities of those umpires. That is a tremendous progression. People talk about 10,000 hours or ten years from average to world-class. It takes time for the whole culture to shift and for the environment to move with it. And everybody has got to be doing it together. It is not about one person, it is about a team. It is about people complementing each other by doing things in a consistent and focused way to deliver a group outcome. The goal is not to put an Indian umpire on the [ICC’s] Elite Panel; that is a nice by-product. The goal here is to improve and to shift umpiring in this country, and position ourselves, and deliver the best umpiring to people who play.As a by-product, we should do better at first-class, Ranji Trophy level. We should do better at IPL. And we should be supplying more umpires to ICC events. That is how we evaluate. I have got a qualifying event coming up where 14 teams will look to qualify to the World T20 next year. I have got two umpires from India participating there. Last time we had one. That is a shift. That tells me we are making progress. We had an Indian umpire [S Ravi] attend the World Cup and perform well. Firstly, he got selected, and secondly, he performed well. He held his own. He has been doing Test matches for a couple of years. In the IPL this year everyone has improved. That is progress.Yet the general perception remains that Indian umpiring is not up to global standards.
That is an unfair view. I genuinely believe that Indian umpiring is holding its own on the world stage. There is work to be done in all countries. But internationally we are making progress. Domestically we are making progress. Is the job finished? No. It is constant work in progress. Our challenge is to get the resources, tools and knowledge and experience, just like the players.Taufel with the first batch of candidates who took the BCCI’s Level 2 Umpires practical exam in Nagpur•BCCII was talking to [Anil] Kumble at breakfast – it is about [attaining] a consistent strategy across the 29 states. When someone starts at the grass roots to teach them and help them to be a good umpire, and keep working on their skills as they grow all the way through. Part of the challenge now is, how do we take it to the grass roots? That is a big challenge because of the volume: the amount of cricket played, how many umpires there are and the number of players.Everybody has a role to play. The media in the way it promotes positiveness of umpiring and match officiating. The players in the way they respect the role and they conduct themselves on the field and the feedback that they give us. The administrators in creating an environment where people can excel and the pathways are clearly defined. And the public in the way they talk about umpiring and in the way they encourage people to be involved in the game as well. We are not soft targets. We are participants in the game. We are a team and we are doing the best as we can.When will India have an umpire in the Elite Panel?
Our focus is to improve Indian domestic umpiring. We have produced four quality International Panel umpires. They are doing extremely well and one of them [S Ravi] officiated at Lord’s in a Test match. It is his fifth Test match. He has been to a World Cup and put his name up for selection. The rest is up to the selectors. It is a team effort. It is not just about me. It is the work that all the umpiring coaches do.How proud were you when Ravi stood in the Lord’s Test last week?
I did say to Ravi on the first morning that when you leave the umpires room and walk downstairs into the Long Room, when the umpires enter that room, all the members part, they separate and give you access to the ground and they start to applaud spontaneously. Then the hairs on the back of your neck will rise. [I told him] I want to think about the fact that I’m going with you, your team-mates are going with you. It is a great honour and privilege.

Replacement man gets replaced

Dinesh Karthik has often done well when covering for specialists but not well enough to become a regular in the team

Sidharth Monga30-Sep-2013During the Asia Cup in Dambulla in 2010, Virender Sehwag was ruled out with a hamstring injury on June 21. The same evening, Dinesh Karthik, a replacement flown in from India, was in the nets, and playing an international on June 22. One of his team-mates welcomed him thus: ” (Tell us the truth, you were in Colombo, right?)” The joke being that Karthik had turned up at such short notice, and that he had become so accustomed to turning up as a replacement in such a manner, that it felt that he was almost shadowing the team.Who knows he might have been? For Karthik is the specialist replacement man of Indian cricket. For whenever somebody gets injured, you call Karthik. Opener down? Go for DK. Middle-order batsman gone? Go for DK. Wicketkeeper resting? DK’s there. Test opener out of form on green tracks? Worry not, there’s DK. In ODIs, Karthik has replaced all sorts of people, and has batted at all positions from 1 to 7. Who knows he might have learned bowling too? Who knows he might even have been able to fill in for N Srinivasan?Karthik is easy to like. He is energetic on the field. He doesn’t mind making sacrifices as long he is part of the team. He doesn’t tell the team that a certain position is his preference. He doesn’t mind giving up wicketkeeping and fielding anywhere: in the deep, inside the circle, under the helmet. And he hasn’t been that bad a replacement either. The problem, though, is he hasn’t been able to graduate from being the specialist replacement man. He does well when called up in difficult circumstances, but then doesn’t do enough to hand that band over to someone else.And then you feel bad for him. As you do today, after he lost out to Yuvraj Singh and Ambati Rayudu in the squad for the T20 and first three ODIs against Australia. To make it worse, it isn’t even the kind of selection that you can point out as obviously wrong or unfair. You can imagine even the selectors would have felt bad making this call. In the Champions Trophy in England and in the ODIs in Zimbabwe, he did well in the limited opportunities he got: 169 runs in 203 balls in 10 matches, at an average of 56.33.It was when he got unlimited opportunities to bat, in the tri-series in the West Indies, that he failed, which is possibly why Rayudu has been preferred after both performed similarly in the Zimbabwe series. Possibly it was Karthik’s poor performance on an even easier assignment, against South Africa A, that did it. Possibly Karthik has grown too used to the uncertainty that being a replacement player brings, and finds himself lost when it comes to carving out a permanent role for himself.After he had put that ribbing – not entirely in good humour – out of the way in Dambulla, Karthik rattled off 40 in his first match and then a Man-of-the-Match 66 in the final. He has probably made bigger sacrifices in Test cricket, chipping in as a replacement opener for both injured and out-of-form stars. His best came in England in 2007 when he consistently gave India good starts along with Wasim Jaffer. It was India’s first series win in England in 21 years.Karthik averages 47 as an opener outside India, in four Tests played in England and South Africa. All those four Tests came around 2007, but then he failed to fill up his boots in the best conditions to open an innings in – the subcontinent. Then he lost out to an inspired selection, that of Virender Sehwag for the tour of Australia. The next time he replaced somebody in a Test was when MS Dhoni decided to sit out the tour of Sri Lanka in 2008. And when he failed against Muttiah Muralitharan and Ajantha Mendis, along with some of the greatest batsmen India has ever produced, his Test career was all but over.Therein lies a lesson, especially for Test openers who think hundreds don’t matter, contribution to wins does. Karthik has been making crucial contributions, but he hadn’t done enough when the going was good. He had plucky thirties and fifties, but not enough big hundreds. He can look around and point to a few others who have got longer ropes with similar results, but he will also know he has himself come short.For one, as a wicketkeeper, Karthik made too many mistakes, and lost his Test replacement duties to the more correct Wriddhiman Saha. Technically perhaps, Dhoni is not a much better wicketkeeper, and Karthik the Test batsman might be just as good, but Dhoni cuts out the glaring mistakes with the big gloves on and scores the big hundreds when he has it going for him.The case with his ODI replacement – either Yuvraj or Rayudu – is the same. The selectors possibly see Rayudu as a purer batsman who will deliver those big innings. Karthik is not out of the picture yet. He is only 28, he is fit, and hardly goes a domestic season when he doesn’t score big runs. It is entirely possible he will be called up should someone get injured in this series. It is possible he will be more at home then. And his team-mates will wonder if he was already in the city hosting the match, on the off chance someone needs to be replaced.

Shattered ear drums and overzealous security guards

Fighting the humidity in Sharjah

Ghazanfar Hyder04-Sep-2012Choice of game
I have watched Pakistan play at home numerous times but never away. Over time, UAE has proven to be a second home to Pakistan’s national team. It was a crucial match, and the prospect of watching the Australians tackle Saeed Ajmal’s doosra live, was one of the motivating factors to watch this game. However, a visit to the commentarybox, promised by a fellow journalist, certainly increased my excitement.Key performer – Glenn Maxwell
It was a difficult decision, and though the competition between Mohammad Hafeez and Glenn Maxwell was tough, I would vouch for Maxwell. The young allrounder is a joy to watch. The way he played Ajmal under cracking pressure deadened the predominantly Pakistani crowd. The over in which he pulled Shahid Afridi for a six and four completely changed the dimension of the game.Security
One of the most irate aspects of this game was security; I got off to meet a friend in the press box but was instantly given a curt nod by the security personnel. Even after an explanation, he turned me down. The second instance of the security being a hindrance was when I had to go outside the stadium to get a spare battery. On my way back, I was refused entry even after showing my pass. The justification was that I should have gotten another pass when I had come out – highly confusing as there weren’t any passes being given on my way out. After a lengthy debate and ringing my friend, I was finally let in. It was then explained to me that security has been tightened on the orders of the ICC Anti-Corruption Unit after a recent wave of increased match-fixing around the cricketing world, and understandably there would strictly be no compromise on this.The weather
It’s one thing to sit in front of a television and read the weather forecast but it’s entirely different to be physically in the middle of the packed stadium in the humid desert heat. The crowd, however, kept themselves well hydrated at all intervals, so much that the water salesman ran out of supplies. The humidity was so intense, at one point I spotted a journalist waving his passport across his face for air. The Australian players used ice jackets and there were plenty of dressing room visits for ice baths to somehow reduce the effect.Crowd meter
I was seated in the stands near long-on and it provided me with a spectacularview of the packed stadium with a deafening crowd, playing horns and drums. The man who was playing happened to be seated right beside me, leaving my ear drums ringing after the fall of each Australian wicket. On the downside, the audience was much less friendly to the Australian team, drastically bringing down the sporting atmosphere of the match. There were only half a dozen Australian flags in the stadium and, ironically, were being waved by Pakistanis. Unsurprisingly, this was met by jeering and booing by the rest of the crowd. Overall a highly charged, passionate and thoroughly enjoyable crowd but equally biased.One thing I’d have changed about the day
The strange timing of the matches. On my way to the stadium, a local taxi driver complained how difficult it was to watch a match on a weekday which finishes at nearly 2AM local time. The ICC believed that starting matches earlier in the day would make it unplayable as the heat would be unbearable for the players. However, a different season could have been considered to overcome this problem – the matches could have been pushed a month forward when the weather in the UAE is comparatively cooler in the day (drops down to 23 degree Celsius).Marks out of 10
6It certainly was not one of the most interesting matches I have witnessed. However, the threat posed by the Pakistani spinners and a thrashing reply from Australia, combined with an enthusiastic crowd were definitely the upsides of game. It’s a shame the nature of the local climate and overzealous security took the shine away from the game.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus